Information
Commission - Different procedures for different types of complaints
One
of the first tasks of the Information Commissions will be
to develop - and publish - detailed procedural guidelines
regarding how exactly an appeal will be processed. Section
19(11) of the Act specifically requires that the Information
Commissions shall decide appeal in accordance with such procedure
as may be prescribed. These procedures will be found in the
Appeal Rules and/or will take the form of internal procedures
manuals.
As
noted previously, section 18(1) gives Information Commissions
a very broad
power to hear appeals, which empowers them to review any
complaint regarding alleged non-compliance with the law. Appeals
are not limited - as they were in some Indian State RTI laws
- to simply reviewing alleged wrongful decisions regarding
non-disclosure of information. Additionally, section 24(1)
gives Information Commissions a role in determining when information
should be released by an intelligence or security agencies
which is otherwise exempted under s.24(1), on the basis that
the information relates sought "is in respect of allegations
of violations of human rights".
As
a consequence of the breadth of the appeal and oversight remit
of Information Commission, any internal procedural guidelines
which are produced will need to be sure to address the different
challenges that will be thrown up by the different types of
cases the Commission will handle.
When
developing internal procedural guidelines, consideration will
need to be given to dividing up the responsibilities between
Commissioners but also between Commission staff. In this respect,
it may be that Commission staff can be delegated to undertake
basic investigation and/or research tasks, in order to free
up the Commissioners to spend more time considering their
decisions. Throughout the world, many Information Commissioners
delegate a substantial portion of their workload to their
staff, subject to final sign-off on decisions and clear supervision
channels.
|