Section 19(1) of the Central Act allows any person who does not receive a decision from the Public Information Officer (PIO) within the set time limit, or who is aggrieved by a decision, to send an appeal to an officer who is directly superior in rank to the PIO. The appeal must be made within 30 days of actual receipt of the decision or 30 days from when the decision should have been made.
Different
states in India have appointed different bodies as Appellate Authorities
under the Central Act. Some have appointed as many Appellate Authorities
as PIOs, while others have made very senior officers in the headquarters
of the public authority the Appellate Authority.
Whatever option is chosen, the list of Appellate Authorities will need to be publicly notified - ideally by publishing it on your website, in local newspapers and by putting up a notice on noticeboards in all offices of your public authority. Full contact details should be published and constantly kept updated.
Even
though an Appellate Authority is usually from the same department
as the original decision-maker, it is important that Appellate Authorities
take this role as an impartial oversight mechanism seriously. The
appeal process is supposed to give the requester a chance
to be heard and to explain why the original decision was incorrect.
Appellate Authorities needs to seriously consider the arguments
on both sides.
Please
click on the link to the Central
RTI Act to read the detailed provisions contained in the law.
Please click on the link to CHRI's
State RTI pages to find out more about relevant rules and implementation
in your specific State.
|